Micronutrient tariff classification and GST treatment for Zn EDTA and Fe EDTA under customs and rate notifications clarified.

Zn EDTA and Fe EDTA were examined for tariff classification under the Customs Tariff Act, with Chapter 31 found inapplicable because the products were micronutrient preparations and not fertilizers containing the relevant fertilizing elements in the required manner. They were also not treated as compounds of Chapters 28 or 29 or as plant growth regulators under Chapter 38, and were classified under Heading 3824 99 90. For GST, the goods were covered under Sl. No. 56 of Schedule II of the notifications as micronutrient goods, attracting 12% tax. Recipient registration under the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 was not a condition for the relevant notification entry.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Zn EDTA and Fe EDTA were classifiable under Chapter Heading 2833, 2921, 3105 or 3808 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. (ii) Whether the goods were covered under the relevant entries of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and corresponding State and Integrated Tax notifications, and the applicable GST rate. (iii) Whether supply to a recipient not registered under the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 affected the applicable entry under the notifications.

Issue (i): Whether Zn EDTA and Fe EDTA were classifiable under Chapter Heading 2833, 2921, 3105 or 3808 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Analysis: The products were examined in the light of the tariff scheme for micronutrients, fertilizers and plant growth regulators. Chapter 31 applies only where the product is used as a fertilizer and contains, as an essential constituent, at least one of the fertilizing elements nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium. The goods in question were held to be micronutrient preparations, but not products whose essential character brought them within Chapter 31. They were also not treated as plant growth regulators under Chapter 38 or as the specific compounds covered by Chapters 28 or 29.

Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Chapter Headings 2833, 2921, 3105 or 3808; they were classifiable under Heading 3824 99 90 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Issue (ii): Whether the goods were covered under the relevant entries of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and corresponding State and Integrated Tax notifications, and the applicable GST rate.

Analysis: The entry for Schedule II covering micronutrients applies to goods under Chapter 28 or 38 that are covered by the Fertilizer Control Order and are manufactured by registered manufacturers. Since the goods were classified under Heading 3824, they were not brought within Schedule I as claimed by the applicant, but were held to fall within Schedule II as micronutrient goods for rate purposes on the facts accepted by the Authority. The applicable notification entry was treated as the relevant one for the supply in question.

Conclusion: The goods were covered under Sl. No. 56 of Schedule-II of the notifications, attracting GST at 12%.

Issue (iii): Whether supply to a recipient not registered under the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 affected the applicable entry under the notifications.

Analysis: The notifications did not prescribe registration of the recipient under the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 as a condition for the relevant entry to apply. The entry turned on the nature of the goods and the manufacturer's registration, not on the buyer's registration status.

Conclusion: Supply to a recipient not registered under the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 had no impact on the applicable notification entry.

Final Conclusion: The ruling determined that the goods were not to be classified as fertilizers under Chapter 31, and the buyer's registration status under the Fertilizer Control Order did not alter the applicable GST treatment.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, the essential character of the goods and the presence of the legally relevant fertilizing constituents determine the entry, and where the notification does not make recipient registration a condition, the tax entry cannot be displaced on that basis.

---