TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Export Oriented Unit liable to pay 18% GST on Notice Pay recovery despite Contract Act arguments</h1> <h3>In Re: M/s. Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.,</h3> In Re: M/s. Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., - 2022 (58) G.S.T.L. 481 (A. A. R. - GST - Guj.) , [2022] 99 G S.T.R. 198 (AAR - Guj) Issues involved:1. Liability to pay GST on recovery of Notice Pay from employees leaving without completing notice period.Detailed Analysis:1. The applicant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit, sought an advance ruling regarding the liability to pay GST on recovery of Notice Pay from employees not completing the notice period. The company's policy required a three months' notice or notice pay in lieu of notice period for termination, with recovery of notice pay if the employee fails to serve the notice period.2. The applicant argued that Notice Pay is a consideration for breach of contract, not a separate supply, as per the Indian Contract Act, 1872. They contended that it falls under the entry of services by an employee to the employer, not subject to GST as per Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017.3. During the hearing, the applicant's representative reiterated their stance, citing precedents where notice pay recovery was not subject to service tax. They referenced a Madras High Court order and other case laws to support their position.4. The Authority considered the applicant's submissions, emphasizing that the CGST and GGST Acts are similar. The key issue was whether the recovery of Notice Pay attracts GST, as per the terms of the employment contract.5. The Authority noted that Notice Pay is a sum agreed upon for breach of contract, falling under the definition of supply as per Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017. The transaction of tolerating an act (quitting without notice) for a sum (notice pay) is deemed a service under Clause 5(e) to Schedule II.6. Referring to a Madras High Court case, the Authority found that recovery of notice pay does not constitute a taxable service as it does not involve the employer rendering any service. However, the Authority held that the applicant is liable to pay GST on recovery of Notice Pay at 18% under the category of 'services not elsewhere classified.'7. The Authority distinguished the cited case laws related to service tax disputes, stating they are not directly applicable to the GST levy issue at hand. The ruling affirmed the liability of the applicant to pay GST on recovery of Notice Pay from employees not completing the notice period as per the contract.This detailed analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the judgment, addressing the legal arguments, interpretations, and findings related to the issue of GST liability on recovery of Notice Pay.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
