TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court issues interim order for Income Tax Returns extension, emphasizing COVID-19 challenges.</h1> <h3>The All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants Versus Union of India</h3> The All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants Versus Union of India - TMI Issues Involved:1. Extension of due date for filing Income Tax Returns (ITR) and Tax Audit Reports (TAR) due to COVID-19 pandemic.2. Frequent changes in forms and utilities by the tax authorities.3. Hardship caused to tax practitioners and assessees due to delayed release of e-filing utilities.4. Non-response to representation by the Union Finance Ministry.5. Legal precedents regarding extension of due dates for tax filings.Detailed Analysis:1. Extension of Due Date for Filing ITR and TAR:The petitioners, a trust and a practicing Chartered Accountant, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to extend the due date for filing ITR and TAR for AY 2020-21 to 31st January 2021, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and related work constraints. They argued that the current extension to 31st October 2020 was insufficient given the ongoing pandemic and the government directives on workplace safety and reduced workforce. The petitioners highlighted the severe hardship faced by tax practitioners in completing audit work within the extended due date, exacerbated by the pandemic.2. Frequent Changes in Forms and Utilities:The petitioners contended that the respondents frequently made last-minute changes to forms and utilities, which caused significant delays and reduced the effective time available for filing returns. They provided a detailed chart showing the delays in the release of e-filing utilities for various ITR forms, arguing that such delays curtailed the time available for filing returns to a great extent. The petitioners emphasized that such frequent changes and delays were arbitrary and unreasonable, violating Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.3. Hardship Caused to Tax Practitioners and Assessees:The petitioners argued that the delayed release of e-filing utilities caused severe hardship to tax practitioners and assessees. They pointed out that tax audits are detailed and time-consuming exercises, and the delayed issuance of forms and utilities left insufficient time for practitioners to complete their work. The petitioners also highlighted that more than 50% of ITRs and TARs were filed using private software, which required time to update in response to changes in schema and utilities.4. Non-response to Representation by the Union Finance Ministry:The petitioners submitted that they had made a detailed representation to the Union Finance Minister on 12th October 2020, seeking an extension of the due date for filing ITR and TAR. However, there had been no response from the respondents, prompting the petitioners to seek judicial intervention.5. Legal Precedents Regarding Extension of Due Dates:The petitioners relied on two previous judgments by the Gujarat High Court, where the court had criticized the respondents' tendency to make last-minute changes and had directed the extension of due dates for filing returns. The court in those cases had emphasized the duty of the respondents to ensure that necessary utilities for e-filing returns were made available at the beginning of the assessment year. The petitioners argued that the current situation was similar and warranted a similar extension of the due date.Court's Interim Order:After hearing the arguments, the court decided to keep the writ application pending and pass an interim order in the larger interest of justice. The court directed the Union of India, Ministry of Finance, to immediately look into the issue, particularly the representation dated 12th October 2020, and take an appropriate decision by 12th January 2021. The court emphasized that the powers given to the CBDT are beneficial in nature and should be exercised to avoid undue hardship to taxpayers. The court also noted that the time period for the officials of the tax department had been extended to 31st March 2021 due to the pandemic, suggesting that a similar extension for taxpayers should be considered.The matter was posted for further hearing on 13th January 2021, with the respondents directed to apprise the court of any decision or development in the matter by the next hearing date.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
