Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding reimbursement of differential tax arising from the transition from VAT to GST in a works contract required adjudication on merits in the writ petition, and whether interim protection against coercive action was warranted pending consideration by the competent authority.
Analysis: The writ petition was treated as covered by the revised guidelines issued by the Government of Odisha for works contracts under GST. The petitioner was directed to submit a comprehensive representation before the appropriate authority, which was to examine and dispose of the grievance in the light of the revised guidelines within the time indicated by the Court. Pending such consideration, coercive action was restrained until the specified date.
Outcome: The petition was disposed of with a direction to pursue the representation before the competent authority and with interim protection against coercive action till the date specified in the order.