Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal overturns disallowance of rent expenses under Income Tax Act</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of rent expenses of Rs. 8,80,000 and the disallowance of Rs. 10,000 under section 69C of the ... Disallowance of rent expenses - Not been established by assessee that the premise used for business purpose - assessee explained that due to expansion of the business operation of the company it had taken the premise on rent to carry out business and holding meetings with brokers/parties as staying in the hotel was costly and more expensive - HELD THAT:- Looking to the revenue from operation of the assessee company to the amount of ₹ 1,33,38,36,680/- for assessment year 2012-13, the impugned expenses of ₹ 8,80,000/- was only 0.05% of the total revenue from operation and there was increased in the revenue from operation from ₹ 1,33,38,36,680/- for assessment year 2012-13 to ₹ 1,76,28,64,861/- for assessment year 2013-14 which demonstrate expansion in the business operation of the assessee company. It is also undisputed fact that similar rent expenses were incurred by the assessee in respect of same property in subsequent year 2014-15 and 2015-16 and the Assessing Officer had allowed the same while framing scrutiny assessment year u/s. 143(3) of the Act. In the light of the above facts and circumstances, we consider that the action of Assessing Officer in disallowing the rent expenses in the year under consideration is not justified - Decided in favour of assessee. Disallowance u/s. 69C - assessee had purchased cutting machine but no freight has been accounted - assessee explained that it had obtained the delivery of the said machine in its own tempo, therefore, no separate expenditure towards freight was accounted - HELD THAT:- It is observed that Assessing Officer has not brought any evidence before invoking section 69C of the act that assessee has incurred any unexplained expenditure - revenue authorities have not brought any evidence on record to show that the assessee has actually incurred any expenditure and the entire addition has been made on presumption basis. We consider that such addition on presumption basis is not justified, therefore, we direct the Assessing Officer to delete the impugned addition. Accordingly, this ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed. Issues involved:1. Disallowance of rent expenses of Rs. 8,80,0002. Disallowance of Rs. 10,000 under section 69C of the Income Tax ActIssue 1 - Disallowance of rent expenses of Rs. 8,80,000:The Assessing Officer disallowed rent expenses claimed by the assessee for a premise in Mumbai, stating it was not proven to be used for business purposes. The CIT(A) upheld this decision. However, during the appeal, the assessee presented evidence including the leave and license agreement, arguing that the property was used as a guest house for directors on business trips. The Tribunal noted that the rented premise was used for business meetings and temporary residential purposes of directors. Considering the minimal expense compared to the revenue and similar expenses allowed in subsequent years, the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance was unjustified and deleted the addition.Issue 2 - Disallowance of Rs. 10,000 under section 69C:The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 10,000 as unexplained expenses for freight charges on a purchased machine from Surendranagar. The assessee explained that it used its own tempo for transportation, but the Assessing Officer disagreed. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. In the appeal, the Tribunal found that the authorities failed to refute the claim that the assessee used its own tempo for delivery. The Tribunal observed that no evidence was presented to invoke section 69C, which requires unexplained expenditures. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal concluded that the addition was made on presumption and directed the Assessing Officer to delete it.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning both the disallowance of rent expenses and the disallowance under section 69C. The order was pronounced on 31-12-2020.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found