Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the revision of assessment proceedings was barred by limitation under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. (ii) Whether the writ petition was maintainable despite the availability of a statutory appeal.
Issue (i): Whether the revision of assessment proceedings was barred by limitation under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The original assessment was dated 12.06.2009, while the revision notice was issued only on 09.04.2018. Under Section 16(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, revision of escaped turnover assessment can be made only within five years from the date of the final assessment order. Since the initiating notice was issued beyond that period, the reassessment proceedings were beyond limitation.
Conclusion: The revision of assessment proceedings was barred by limitation and could not be sustained.
Issue (ii): Whether the writ petition was maintainable despite the availability of a statutory appeal.
Analysis: The challenge went to the very jurisdiction of the assessing authority because the proceedings were initiated beyond the statutory period of limitation. In such a case, the existence of an alternate appellate remedy does not preclude writ jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The writ petition was maintainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned revision assessment order was set aside and the petitioner obtained relief on the ground of limitation, with the alternate-remedy objection repelled.
Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment or revision initiated beyond the statutory limitation period is without jurisdiction, and a writ petition is maintainable to challenge such proceedings notwithstanding an alternate statutory remedy.