TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court emphasizes fair procedures in tax assessments, quashes hasty orders, upholds natural justice</h1> <h3>M/s. Sangeeteha Match Works, Versus The State Tax Officer (Inspection Cell), Virudhunagar.</h3> M/s. Sangeeteha Match Works, Versus The State Tax Officer (Inspection Cell), Virudhunagar. - TMI Issues:Challenging assessment orders under Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for assessment years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019.Detailed Analysis:1. Issue of Sufficient Opportunity for Reply:The petitioner received a show cause notice highlighting defects in monthly returns for both assessment years. The petitioner requested additional time to reply, citing the need to consult their Auditor. Despite sending representations seeking time, the respondent passed assessment orders hastily, without granting sufficient opportunity. The respondent's contention that personal hearing was offered but not availed does not justify the lack of time granted for a detailed response.2. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice:The respondent failed to provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's requests for time extension in the assessment orders. The impugned orders were passed swiftly after the show cause notice, without proper consideration of the petitioner's representations. This lack of explanation and hasty decision-making violates the principles of natural justice.3. Legal Provisions and Precedents:Section 75(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 allows for granting time for reply if sufficient cause is shown, with a limit of three adjournments. The Court observed that the petitioner's reasons for seeking an extension were valid, considering the number of defects and the need for consultation with an Auditor. The judgment in Tvl. Steel Mart Private limited Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer supports the necessity of granting time for reply before passing assessment orders.4. Remedy and Judgment:The respondent's argument that statutory appeal is the only remedy is countered by the Court's finding of a violation of natural justice. The Court directed the petitioner to pay a specified sum to the respondent, following which the impugned assessment orders would be quashed. The matter was remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for affording the petitioner sufficient opportunity and a right to personal hearing.In conclusion, the judgment highlights the importance of providing adequate time for reply, explaining reasons for decisions, and upholding principles of natural justice in assessment proceedings under the Goods and Services Tax Act. The Court's decision to quash the assessment orders and remand the matter for reconsideration underscores the significance of fair procedures in tax assessments.
TaxTMI 