Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Income tax appeal tribunal upholds deletion of salary addition; refund not voluntary.

        The Dy. CIT, Circle-2 (1) (1), Baroda Versus Shri Rajamannar Thennati, Sun Pharma Advance Research Centre, SPARC, Tandalj, Vadodara

        The Dy. CIT, Circle-2 (1) (1), Baroda Versus Shri Rajamannar Thennati, Sun Pharma Advance Research Centre, SPARC, Tandalj, Vadodara - TMI Issues Involved:
        - Addition towards income from salary deleted by CIT(A)
        - Taxability of salary under section 15(b)
        - Taxability of perquisite value of interest

        Issue 1: Addition towards income from salary deleted by CIT(A)

        The assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2014-15 challenged the order of CIT(A)-2, Vadodara, deleting the addition towards income from salary. The Revenue contended that the salary, whether due or not, and whether received or not, is chargeable to income tax. The Assessing Officer added an amount to the total income of the assessee based on the total salary originally received. However, the CIT(A) allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the refund of excess salary was not voluntary but to comply with legal requirements. The CIT(A) relied on a decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court to support this conclusion. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision.

        Issue 2: Taxability of salary under section 15(b)

        The Revenue argued that the amount in question should be taxable under section 15(b) even if considered as 'not due.' However, the CIT(A) analyzed the facts, highlighting that the entitlement to remuneration is governed by the Companies law and approved by the Central Government. The CIT(A) noted that the remuneration exceeding the approved amount was not due to the appellant. The CIT(A) further emphasized that the refund of salary was made to comply with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and was not voluntary. Citing a relevant decision, the CIT(A) held that only the net amount of salary after deducting the refund amount is taxable. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was directed to be deleted.

        Issue 3: Taxability of perquisite value of interest

        The Revenue contended that the perquisite value of interest should be taxable as the assessee did not state that any interest was charged by the employer. However, the CIT(A) considered the facts and the legal requirements under the Companies Act, 1956. The CIT(A) concluded that the refund of the excess salary was not voluntary but to comply with legal provisions. Relying on a decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, the CIT(A) held that the refund was made to adhere to the law, and therefore, the excess amount should not be considered as income assessable to tax. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue.

        In conclusion, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition towards income from salary, emphasizing that the refund of excess salary was not voluntary but to comply with legal requirements. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found