Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 35 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was sustainable when the alleged input tax credit had not been allowed in the original assessment.
Analysis: Section 35 applies where, after assessment, the Commissioner has reason to believe that taxable turnover has escaped assessment, been under-assessed, or that a deduction or tax credit has been wrongly allowed. The power is therefore attracted only when there is a prior assessment error of the kind contemplated by the provision. On the facts, the original assessment itself had disallowed the credit in question, so there was no earlier allowance of tax credit that could justify invoking section 35 for reassessment on the same basis. The reassessment thus exceeded the statutory scope.
Conclusion: The reassessment under section 35 was not tenable in law and the challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.