Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account could continue beyond one year and whether the bank was required to permit operation of the account.
Analysis: The provisional attachment was made under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The statutory scheme provides that such attachment ceases after one year from the date of the order made under the enabling provision. As no fresh order was passed after the original attachment order, the attachment had lost its force and could not be treated as subsisting. In these circumstances, continued freezing of the bank account was unwarranted.
Conclusion: The attachment had ceased to operate by expiry of the statutory period, and the petitioner was entitled to operate the bank account.