Tribunal affirms switch to Project completion method, dismissing Revenue's appeal on accounting adjustment.

The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to delete the addition of Rs. 17,74,99,165 due to the assessee's valid switch from the Percentage completion method to the Project completion method. The Tribunal found the change in accounting method was made in good faith and due to unforeseen circumstances, such as project delays and legal issues. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity and consistency of the revised return and the Project completion method applied by the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
Deletion of addition of Rs. 17,74,99,165 due to change in accounting method from Percentage completion to Project completion.

Analysis:
The appeal pertains to the deletion of an addition of Rs. 17,74,99,165 made by the Assessing Officer due to the change in the method of accounting adopted by the assessee from Percentage completion to Project completion. The assessee initially declared income using the Percentage completion method but later switched to the Project completion method in a revised return for the assessment year 2006-07. The Assessing Officer disagreed with this change and computed the total income based on the original return, denying the deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) accepted the assessee's explanation for the change and deleted the addition. The Revenue challenged this decision before the Tribunal.

Upon review, the Tribunal noted that both the Percentage completion method and the Project completion method are recognized accounting methods. The Percentage completion method recognizes profit based on the progress of construction each year, while the Project completion method recognizes profit upon project completion. In this case, the assessee switched to the Project completion method due to unforeseen circumstances, such as project delays and legal issues. The Tribunal found that the assessee's change in accounting method was valid and done in good faith. The Revenue did not dispute the validity of the revised return or the consistent application of the Project completion method in subsequent years. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to delete the addition.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, affirming the decision to delete the addition of Rs. 17,74,99,165. The Tribunal found no fault in the assessee's switch from the Percentage completion method to the Project completion method, considering it a valid and bona fide change in accounting method. The Tribunal's decision was based on the assessee's consistent application of the Project completion method and the absence of any irregularities in the revised return.

---