Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment orders under Section 27(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were liable to be quashed for non-consideration of the dealer's reply and denial of personal hearing, amounting to violation of natural justice.
Analysis: The dealer produced material showing that replies to the revision of assessment notices had been sent and received, while the Revenue did not produce convincing contra material to establish non-receipt. The assessment orders did not reflect consideration of those replies. The record also showed that no personal hearing was afforded before finalising the assessments. In tax proceedings, where a prejudicial order is made without considering the assessee's response and without giving a hearing, the assessment suffers from breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The reassessment orders were rightly held unsustainable and were quashed, with a direction for fresh consideration after granting opportunity and personal hearing to the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without considering the assessee's reply and without affording personal hearing violates the principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.