Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether death duty paid in the United Kingdom, interest on delayed payment, bank charges and related expenses were deductible from the principal value of the estate under the Estate Duty Act, 1953.
Analysis: Section 30 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 provides for relief from double taxation through agreements with reciprocating countries, and the agreement with the United Kingdom already afforded credit for the foreign duty. Section 48 allows only additional expense incurred in administering or realising property situated outside India, while section 49 separately deals with duty payable in a non-reciprocating country. Reading these provisions together, the foreign estate duty itself could not be treated as an administrative or realisation expense under section 48. The claim for interest on delayed payment and bank charges also failed for want of material showing that such amounts were necessarily incurred by reason of the property being outside India. The allowance granted for solicitor's fee was not disturbed, but that did not justify the broader deduction claim.
Conclusion: The deductions claimed on account of United Kingdom death duty, interest and bank charges were not allowable under section 48, and the assessee's challenge failed.