Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance on account of alleged bogus purchases should be sustained at 100% or restricted to the profit element embedded in such purchases by aligning the gross profit rate with that of genuine purchases.
Analysis: The assessee had furnished purchase documents and payments were through banking channels, while the sales were not doubted. In such a situation, full disallowance of purchases was held to be impermissible because sales could not ordinarily be generated without corresponding purchases. The purchases were treated as having been routed through the grey market, and the addition was required to be confined to the profit element embedded in the disputed purchases. The matter was therefore sent back for recomputation in line with the principle that the gross profit rate on such purchases should be brought at par with the rate on genuine purchases.
Conclusion: The 100% addition was not sustained. The addition was directed to be restricted to the profit element in the bogus purchases, and the issue was remitted to the assessing officer for fresh computation.