Hotel amenities levy treated as luxury tax, not income tax, and Jammu and Kashmir competence upheld.

The Jammu and Kashmir Hotel (Amenities and Services) Tariff Taxation Act, 1980 was upheld as within the Jammu and Kashmir Legislature's competence. The charging scheme taxed amenities and services supplied in hotels, with tariff used only as the measure of levy; on that basis, the impost was characterised as a luxury tax under Entry 62 of List II rather than an income tax under Entry 82 of List I. Reading Article 370, the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954, and Section 5 of the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution, the Court accepted that legislative power remained with the State except where Parliament was empowered, and the validity challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Jammu and Kashmir Legislature had legislative competence to enact the Jammu and Kashmir Hotel (Amenities and Services) Tariff Taxation Act, 1980, and whether the levy was a tax on income under Entry 82 of List I or a tax on luxuries under Entry 62 of List II.

Analysis: The charging scheme showed that the tax was imposed on amenities and services supplied in hotels, with tariff used only as the measure of levy. The constitutional position applicable to Jammu and Kashmir, read with Article 370, the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954, and Section 5 of the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution, left legislative competence with the State except for matters within Parliament's power. The Court treated the impugned levy as analogous to the hotel luxury taxes upheld earlier and accepted the same constitutional characterization, namely that the impost fell within Entry 62 of List II and not Entry 82 of List I.

Conclusion: The Act was within the legislative competence of the Jammu and Kashmir Legislature and was not a tax on income; the challenge to validity failed.

---