Tribunal Approves Resolution Plan for International Book House: Fair Treatment for Creditors

The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan submitted by Nitrex Chemicals India Limited for International Book House Private Limited under Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after finding it compliant with all mandatory requirements. Allegations of discriminatory distribution among secured financial creditors were dismissed, with the Tribunal upholding the CoC's decision based on the value of security held by each creditor. The treatment of unsecured financial creditors was deemed non-discriminatory, with all unsecured creditors receiving equal treatment in the distribution plan.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Allegation of discriminatory distribution among similarly situated secured financial creditors.
3. Treatment of unsecured financial creditors in the distribution of the Resolution Plan amount.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
The application MA 3114/2019 was filed seeking approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by Nitrex Chemicals India Limited for International Book House Private Limited. The Tribunal noted that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) had approved the Resolution Plan with a 96.91% vote share. The Resolution Plan included a detailed distribution pattern and proposed various payments to different classes of creditors, including secured financial creditors, unsecured financial creditors, employees, and operational creditors. The CoC also approved the distribution pattern with a 66.98% vote share. The Tribunal found that the Resolution Plan complied with all mandatory requirements under Section 30 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and relevant regulations. Therefore, the Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan under Section 31(1) of the Code, making it binding on all stakeholders involved.

2. Allegation of discriminatory distribution among similarly situated secured financial creditors:
IndusInd Bank Limited (IBL) filed MA 3197/2019 alleging discrimination in the distribution of the Resolution Plan amount. IBL contended that it was allotted a meager sum compared to Religare Finvest Limited (R3), despite both being secured financial creditors. The Tribunal noted that the CoC, in its commercial wisdom, decided the distribution pattern based on the value of the security held by each creditor. Religare's security was an immovable asset with a higher liquidation value, whereas IBL's security was against current assets with a lower liquidation value. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court judgment in the Essar Steel case, emphasizing that the CoC's commercial wisdom prevails in such matters. The Tribunal found no fault in the CoC's decision and dismissed the application, stating that the distribution pattern was within the legal framework and not discriminatory.

3. Treatment of unsecured financial creditors in the distribution of the Resolution Plan amount:
MA 3236/2019 was filed by an unsecured financial creditor seeking equal treatment with other financial creditors. The applicant argued that the distribution pattern was discriminatory. The Tribunal observed that all unsecured financial creditors were given the same treatment in the Resolution Plan, sharing a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. The Tribunal reiterated that secured and unsecured financial creditors could not be treated alike and found no discriminatory treatment among the unsecured creditors. The Tribunal dismissed the application, stating that the treatment of unsecured creditors was within the legal parameters and consistent with judicial pronouncements.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan submitted by Nitrex Chemicals India Limited, finding it compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and relevant regulations. The allegations of discriminatory distribution among secured financial creditors were dismissed, with the Tribunal upholding the CoC's commercial wisdom. The treatment of unsecured financial creditors was also found to be non-discriminatory and within legal bounds.

---