Margin money in FDRs not asset; Bank guarantees independent; Pre-existing rights protected.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, ruling that the margin money held as Fixed Deposits Receipts (FDRs) was not considered an asset of the Corporate Debtor but rather held in trust for the beneficiaries of the bank guarantees. The Resolution Plan could not extinguish the bank guarantees, as they were independent contracts. The Tribunal emphasized that pre-existing rights of third parties could not be invalidated by the Resolution Plan, and the margin money could only be released upon discharge of the bank guarantees. Consequently, the application was deemed misconceived and dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Release of Fixed Deposits Receipts (FDRs) held as margin money against bank guarantees.
2. Fulfillment of export obligations under EPCG Authorisation.
3. Legal status of bank guarantees and margin money as assets of the Corporate Debtor.
4. Impact of the approved Resolution Plan on the rights of beneficiaries of bank guarantees.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Release of Fixed Deposits Receipts (FDRs) Held as Margin Money Against Bank Guarantees:
The application was filed by the Chairman of the Monitoring Committee seeking directions for the release of Fixed Deposits Receipts (FDRs) of the Corporate Debtor maintained with SBI. The FDRs were held as margin money against bank guarantees issued by SBI on behalf of the Corporate Debtor. The primary issue for adjudication was whether the margin money should be released, considering it as the asset of the Corporate Debtor.

2. Fulfillment of Export Obligations Under EPCG Authorisation:
The Corporate Debtor had obtained EPCG Authorisation for import of capital goods with specific export obligations. The DGFT argued that the export obligations remained unfulfilled, and as per the conditions of the EPCG Authorisation and Foreign Trade Policy, the Corporate Debtor was still bound to fulfill these obligations. Consequently, DGFT maintained its right over the bank guarantees issued by SBI on behalf of the Corporate Debtor.

3. Legal Status of Bank Guarantees and Margin Money as Assets of the Corporate Debtor:
SBI and DGFT contended that bank guarantees are independent contracts between the bank and the beneficiary, and the margin money held as FDRs is not refundable to the Corporate Debtor unless the bank is discharged from its liabilities. The Tribunal referred to Supreme Court judgments which established that bank guarantees are distinct contracts independent of the underlying transactions, and the margin money acquires the character of a trust for the benefit of the beneficiary. The Tribunal emphasized that assets held in trust for third parties cannot be considered assets of the Corporate Debtor, as per Section 36(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

4. Impact of the Approved Resolution Plan on the Rights of Beneficiaries of Bank Guarantees:
The applicant argued that the Resolution Plan approved by the NCLT envisaged the cancellation of all pledges, liens, or encumbrances on the fixed deposits, thereby extinguishing the bank guarantees. However, the Tribunal noted that the Resolution Plan approval order explicitly stated that exemptions or discounts not permissible under law were not approved. The Tribunal held that the Resolution Plan could not extinguish the bank guarantees as they constituted independent contracts between the bank and the beneficiary. The Tribunal also clarified that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC did not cover margin money held against bank guarantees.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the application, holding that the margin money held as FDRs was not the asset of the Corporate Debtor but was impressed with the character of a trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries of the bank guarantees. The Tribunal emphasized that the Resolution Plan could not invalidate the pre-existing rights of third parties, and the margin money could only be released once the bank guarantees were discharged. The application was deemed misconceived and dismissed accordingly.

---