Tribunal affirms write-off of stale stock as legitimate expense, dismissing revenue's appeal.

The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, allowing the write-off of stale stock amounting to Rs. 11,99,41,682/- as a legitimate expense. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the relief granted to the assessee based on accepted accounting principles and judicial precedents.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the disallowance of stock written off amounting to Rs. 11,99,41,682/- by the assessee.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Justification of the Disallowance of Stock Written Off:
The core issue in this appeal was whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] was justified in providing relief to the assessee concerning the disallowance of stock written off amounting to Rs. 11,99,41,682/-.

Background and Assessee's Business:
The assessee, engaged in the manufacturing of pickles, spices, pastes, and chutneys, had filed its return for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. Nil. The business operations were conducted through two units: one at Ratlam and another at Nasik. The Nasik unit, operated by the wholly-owned subsidiary Wisdem Machines Pvt. Ltd., faced significant labor unrest, leading to the accumulation and staleness of stock.

AO’s Observations:
During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had written off stock worth Rs. 11,99,41,682/- as it had become stale. The AO questioned the timing of this write-off, suggesting that it was done to offset the net profit earned during the year, and proceeded to disallow the write-off.

Assessee's Submissions:
The assessee argued that the stock was perishable and had become stale due to labor unrest and other operational issues. The stock write-off was supported by detailed submissions, including stock movement details and evidence of labor disturbances. The assessee cited various judicial precedents and accounting standards (AS-2) to justify the valuation of closing stock at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

CIT(A)’s Findings:
The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's contentions, noting that the stock write-off was scientifically supported by circumstances. The CIT(A) observed that the labor unrest had significantly impacted the business, leading to the staleness of stock. The write-off was deemed justifiable, considering the perishable nature of the goods and the operational disruptions.

Tribunal’s Analysis:
The Tribunal reviewed the submissions and evidence presented. It noted that the AO's assertion that the write-off was done to offset profits was incorrect, as the assessee had incurred a loss during the year. The Tribunal emphasized that the stock write-off was a pragmatic decision in light of the closure of the factory and the perishable nature of the goods. The Tribunal found no ulterior motive in the timing of the write-off and highlighted that the stock had been included in the closing stock valuation up to 31.3.2011.

Judicial Precedents:
The Tribunal referred to several judicial decisions supporting the assessee's position, including the Supreme Court's rulings in Chainrup Sampatram vs. CIT and CIT vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd., which upheld the principle of valuing stock at cost or net realizable value, whichever is lower. The Tribunal also cited decisions from various High Courts and Tribunals that supported the write-off of obsolete stock under exceptional circumstances.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the assessee's decision to write off the stale stock was justified and in accordance with accepted accounting principles and judicial precedents. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, granting relief to the assessee and dismissing the revenue's appeal.

Final Order:
The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the write-off of Rs. 11,99,41,682/- as a legitimate expense.

Pronouncement:
The order was pronounced on 03/12/2020 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.

---