Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Approves Reliance's Resolution Plan under Insolvency Laws</h1> <h3>ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Versus RELIANCE INFRATEL LIMITED</h3> ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Versus RELIANCE INFRATEL LIMITED - [2021] 224 Comp Cas 608 (NCLT–Mum) Issues Involved:1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.2. Compliance with the provisions of the Code and Regulations.3. Distribution and satisfaction of claims and debts.4. Management and implementation of the Resolution Plan.5. Pending applications and their impact on the Resolution Plan.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:The application was filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) seeking approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by Reliance Projects & Property Management Services Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the Corporate Debtor commenced on 15.05.2018, and after various procedural steps and appeals, the Committee of Creditors (CoC) approved the Resolution Plan with a 100% voting share on 02.03.2020.2. Compliance with the provisions of the Code and Regulations:The RP conducted the CIRP in compliance with the Code and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2016. The Resolution Plan was verified for eligibility under Section 29(A) of the Code, and the RP submitted Form H under Regulation 39(4), confirming compliance. The Tribunal noted that the Resolution Plan met the requirements specified in Section 30(2) of the Code and Regulations 37, 38, 38(1A), and 39(4).3. Distribution and satisfaction of claims and debts:The Resolution Plan proposed a total payment of INR 3,720 crores for the resolution of the Corporate Debtor. The plan included:- Payment of CIRP costs in full.- Payment to workmen/employees and operational creditors.- Capital reduction and equity infusion.- Payment to financial creditors on a pro-rata basis.The Tribunal highlighted that the plan provided for the full and final satisfaction and discharge of all claims and debts against the Corporate Debtor, ensuring no further liabilities for the Resolution Applicant post-implementation.4. Management and implementation of the Resolution Plan:The Resolution Plan outlined the management of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern, leveraging the expertise of the Reliance Industries Group. A monitoring committee comprising the RP, nominees of approving financial creditors, and nominees of the Resolution Applicant would oversee the implementation. The plan included provisions for fund infusion, human resource augmentation, and infrastructure upgradation.5. Pending applications and their impact on the Resolution Plan:The Tribunal acknowledged the pending applications (IA Nos. 1960 of 2019 and 3055 of 2019) challenging certain claims and decisions. However, it determined that the pendency of these applications would not hinder the approval of the Resolution Plan. The distribution of payments to creditors would be subject to the outcomes of these applications.Conclusion:The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan submitted by Reliance Digital Platform & Project Services Limited, noting its compliance with the Code and Regulations. The plan was deemed fair and equitable to all stakeholders and binding on all parties involved. The approval did not constitute a waiver of any statutory obligations, and the Resolution Applicant was required to obtain necessary approvals from relevant authorities. The moratorium under Section 14 ceased, and the RP and Monitoring Committee were tasked with supervising the implementation of the plan. The RP was directed to forward all records to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and send a copy of the order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant for compliance.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found