Tribunal upholds deductions for scrap sales and disallows Rule 8D for lack of objective satisfaction.

The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] decision in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction under Section 80IC for income from the sale of scrap for A.Y. 2012-13. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal for the same year. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for A.Y. 2012-13, citing the Assessing Officer's failure to provide objective satisfaction for invoking Rule 8D. The appeals of the assessee for A.Ys. 2012-13 and 2014-15 were allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deduction under Section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for income from the sale of scrap.
2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Deduction under Section 80IC for Income from Sale of Scrap
- Background: The assessee, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of insulated wires and cables, claimed a deduction under Section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, including income from the sale of scrap amounting to Rs. 2,97,84,396/- for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2012-13. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, arguing that scrap generated during manufacturing was not a by-product and thus not eligible for deduction.
- CIT(A) Decision: The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleted the disallowance by following previous Tribunal orders in the assessee's own case for earlier years (A.Ys. 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05), where a similar deduction under Section 80IB was allowed.
- Tribunal Decision: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, noting that the issue was covered in favor of the assessee by various Tribunal decisions, including the latest for A.Y. 2014-15. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)’s order and dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13.

Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D
- Background: For A.Y. 2012-13, the assessee claimed exemption on dividend income of Rs. 12.52 crores and offered a disallowance of Rs. 3,47,208/- for expenses related to earning this income. The Assessing Officer, applying Rule 8D, computed the disallowance at Rs. 1,16,92,175/-, leading to an additional disallowance of Rs. 1,13,44,967/-.
- CIT(A) Decision: The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer.
- Tribunal Decision: The Tribunal noted that in the assessee's own case for earlier years (A.Ys. 2008-09 to 2011-12), a similar disallowance was deleted by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessing Officer must record objective satisfaction regarding the incorrectness of the assessee’s claim before invoking Rule 8D, which was not done in this case. Citing the Hon’ble Bombay High Court’s decision in the case of Ultra Tech Cement Ltd., the Tribunal deleted the disallowance for A.Y. 2012-13 and similarly for A.Y. 2014-15, as the facts were identical.

Conclusion:
- The appeal of the Revenue for A.Y. 2012-13 was dismissed.
- The appeals of the assessee for A.Ys. 2012-13 and 2014-15 were allowed.

Order Pronounced: The order was pronounced in the open Court on 2nd December 2020.

---