Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 464 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 could be imposed by the taxing authority without prosecution and conviction before a competent Magistrate.
Analysis: The provisions dealing with terminal tax were construed by comparing section 463, which creates a criminal offence punishable on conviction, with section 464, which uses different language and prescribes only a monetary penalty up to ten times the tax. The Chapter was treated as containing two distinct categories, namely offences and penalties. For offences, prosecution before a competent criminal court was required; for penalties, the taxing authority itself could act. The Commissioner's wide executive powers under section 59 and the power of delegation under section 491 supported the delegation of section 464 functions to the taxing authorities. Sections 469 and 470 did not alter this distinction.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 464 could be imposed by the taxing authority without a prior criminal prosecution or conviction, and the appellant's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute separately provides for a criminal offence on conviction and a distinct revenue penalty without reference to conviction or trial by a Magistrate, the penalty may be imposed by the authority empowered under the Act or by valid delegation.