TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee's Appeal Partially Allowed: Key Decisions on Loss Carryforward, Club Expenses, and MAT</h1> <h3>Ester Industries Limited Versus DCIT, Circle 11 (1), New Delhi</h3> Ester Industries Limited Versus DCIT, Circle 11 (1), New Delhi - TMI Issues:1. Denial of carry forward short-term capital loss.2. Addition of unexplained investments.3. Disallowance of club expenses.4. Addition to book profit for MAT regarding provisions for bad debts and deferred tax.Denial of Carry Forward Short-term Capital Loss:The assessee challenged the denial of carrying forward short-term capital loss of Rs. 1,16,64,344, claiming they were not given an opportunity to support their claim. The Tribunal found that the assessee should be given a chance to provide material for verification. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for proper examination, allowing the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes.Addition of Unexplained Investments:Regarding the addition of Rs. 16.5 lakhs towards unexplained investments, the assessee contended that the investments in Reliance Mutual Fund were erroneously reported in the AIR. Evidence from Reliance Mutual Fund confirmed the mistake, leading to the deletion of the addition by the Tribunal.Disallowance of Club Expenses:The disallowance of Rs. 3,70,696 towards club expenses was challenged by the assessee, claiming the expenses were legitimate revenue deductions. The Tribunal, following a Supreme Court decision, allowed the expenses as revenue deductions, directing the Assessing Officer to delete them.Addition to Book Profit for MAT - Provisions for Bad Debts and Deferred Tax:The Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 18,18,000 for bad and doubtful debts and Rs. 4,82,73,000 for deferred tax to the book profit under Section 115JB for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT). Despite the assessee citing precedents, the Tribunal upheld the additions due to a retrospective amendment to Section 115JB, declining to interfere with the decision.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal but maintained certain additions for statistical purposes.
TaxTMI 