Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to refund of supervision charges collected for outside storage of non-duty paid excisable goods, and whether interest was payable on the refunded amount.
Analysis: The governing circular clarified that, for storage of goods outside the factory premises, physical supervision by Central Excise officers was not envisaged and recovery of merchant overtime charges was no longer warranted. The circular also modified the earlier instructions to that extent, while leaving room only for such other revenue safeguards as the jurisdictional Commissioner might impose. In view of this express administrative clarification, the levy and collection of supervision charges could not be sustained. Since the amount had been collected without authority, refund followed as a matter of consequence. The Court further held that interest was payable on the refunded amount, though on a notional basis at 3% per annum, to balance equities.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to refund of the supervision charges, and the respondents were liable to pay interest on the refunded sum at 3% per annum.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a binding circular expressly withdraws the basis for recovery of supervision charges on outside storage of non-duty paid goods, such charges cannot be retained by the department and must be refunded with appropriate interest.