Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 59 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, was retrospective in operation and could validly be used to reopen an assessment already completed before its commencement.
Analysis: The new provision dealt with property escaping assessment and was materially different from the earlier section 62, which was confined to rectification of mistakes apparent from the record, valuation errors, and omission of property. Although both provisions touched the omission of property, the nature and incidents of the power conferred were not the same. No express words in section 59 gave it retrospective effect, and no necessary implication of retrospectivity could be drawn from its language or scheme. Since the assessment had already been completed before the new provision came into force, reassessment could not be sustained in the absence of a clear legislative mandate, having regard to the principle against interference with vested rights by subsequent legislation.
Conclusion: Section 59 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, is not retrospective, and the reopening of the completed assessment under that provision is bad in law, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were dismissed with costs, and the reassessment proceedings could not be sustained under section 59.
Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment provision will not apply retrospectively to completed assessments unless retrospectivity is expressly stated or necessarily implied from the statute.