Appeal allowed due to lack of administrative approval for scrutiny conversion.

The appeal was allowed as the AO did not obtain administrative approval to convert the case from limited scrutiny to complete scrutiny, as required by CBDT instructions. The Tribunal declared the assessment order null and void, citing the lack of administrative approval, and allowed the assessee's appeal challenging the disallowance under section 14A r/w Rule-8D for Assessment Year 2015-16. The issue of converting limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny without administrative approval was pivotal in the judgment, emphasizing the necessity of obtaining prior approval before expanding the scope of scrutiny.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance under section 14A r/w Rule-8D
2. Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny without administrative approval

Analysis:

1. Disallowance under section 14A r/w Rule-8D:
The appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax related to Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee, engaged in various businesses, filed its return of income electronically, which was selected for scrutiny through CASS. The assessment was framed under section 143(3), determining the total income before adjustment of brought forward losses. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee, leading to the current appeal. The grounds raised by the assessee mainly challenged the disallowance of a specific amount under section 14A r/w Rule-8D. The AR argued that the AO did not have the administrative approval to convert the case from limited scrutiny to complete scrutiny, as required by CBDT instructions. The AR also contended that the AO did not record the mandatory satisfaction for disallowing the expenditure under section 14A. Additionally, the AR argued that the calculation made by the AO for the disallowance was incorrect. The DR supported the lower authorities' order. The Tribunal found that the AO did not obtain administrative approval for converting the case to complete scrutiny, as mandated by CBDT instructions. Citing a similar case, the Tribunal held the assessment order to be null and void, allowing the assessee's appeal.

2. Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny without administrative approval:
The issue of converting the case from limited scrutiny to complete scrutiny without administrative approval was crucial in this judgment. The Tribunal highlighted the requirement for administrative approval from PCIT/CIT when expanding the scope of scrutiny beyond limited scrutiny. The Tribunal referred to CBDT instructions and previous decisions to emphasize the necessity of obtaining prior approval before widening the scope of scrutiny. The Tribunal ruled that without administrative approval, the assessment order was null and void. This issue played a significant role in determining the validity of the assessment order and ultimately led to the allowance of the assessee's appeal.

---