TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal directs reevaluation of witness cross-examination request under Customs Act</h1> <h3>M/s Ranjeev Steels Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE & ST- Ludhiana</h3> M/s Ranjeev Steels Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE & ST- Ludhiana - 2021 (375) E.L.T. 348 (Tri. - Chan.) Issues:1. Cross examination of witnesses2. Maintainability of appeal against the impugned orderCross examination of witnesses:The appellant appealed against an order denying cross examination of certain witnesses crucial to the case. The appellant argued that the denial violated the principle of natural justice and referenced relevant case laws to support the necessity of cross examination. The adjudicating authority had previously been directed by the Tribunal to consider the plea for cross examination. The Tribunal found the impugned order lacking in reasons for rejecting the cross examination, deeming it not a speaking order. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and directed the adjudicating authority to reconsider the request for cross examination without imposing conditions on providing questions in advance.Maintainability of appeal against the impugned order:The Authorized Representative raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal, contending that the order was not final and the adjudication was still pending. However, the Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable under Section 129A (i) of the Customs Act, 1962, as it allowed appeals against decisions or orders by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal rejected the preliminary objection, emphasizing that the intimation by the Superintendent adjudication represented the adjudicating authority.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the request for cross examination of witnesses without imposing conditions and emphasized the importance of providing a speaking order.
TaxTMI 