Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned transfer of the company's assets was voidable under section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 as made with intent to defeat or delay creditors.
Analysis: Section 53 avoids a transfer only where immovable property is transferred with intent to defeat or delay creditors and the transfer operates to remove property from their reach for the debtor's benefit. A debtor may lawfully prefer one or more genuine creditors over others, and such preference does not by itself amount to fraud under the section, so long as the transfer is for adequate consideration, satisfies genuine debts, and no benefit is reserved to the transferor. The findings recorded showed that the sale proceeds were applied in payment of the company's creditors, and there was no finding that the consideration was inadequate or that any benefit was retained by the company.
Conclusion: The transfer was not voidable under section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the challenge to the sale failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer made for adequate consideration in satisfaction of genuine debts, without reservation of any benefit to the transferor, is not voidable under section 53 merely because it prefers some creditors over others.