Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Dividend from foreign company included in assessee's net income but deductible against Indian business loss under s.24(1)</h1> The SC allowed the appeals, set aside the HC judgment, and ruled for the Revenue that dividend income from a foreign (Pakistan) company must be included ... Deductibility of dividend income - Business loss in India u/s 24(1) - Whether the assessee's dividend income from a Pakistan company was deductible against its business loss in India? - Held that:- Once it is accepted that the Agreement preserves the right of each Dominion to determine the assessable income in accordance with the operation of its own laws and it is concerned only with the question of the degree of retention of the tax charged by it consequent upon such assessment, it becomes abundantly clear that the dividend income, inasmuch as it is taxable under the Indian Income-tax Act, by virtue of sub-clause (ii) of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 4, must be brought into the net of income for assessment under the Indian law. It has not been shown to us by learned counsel for the assessee that it constitutes the subject of exemption under any provision of the Indian Income-tax Act. Sub-section (3) of section 4 sets forth the cases in which income is not includible in the total income of the person receiving it. And sections 14 and 16 detail the cases where the statute grants exemption from tax. No provision in the Act has been pointed out from which we may infer that the dividend income in question is not liable to inclusion in determining the total income of the assessee. A perusal of the assessment orders for the two years shows clearly that the assessee did claim a set-off of the Pakistan dividend against the losses of the Indian business. In the second place, there is a duty cast on the Income-tax Officer to apply the relevant provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act for the purpose of determining the true figure of the assessee's taxable income and the consequential tax liability. Merely because the assessee fails to claim the benefit of a set-off, it cannot relieve the Income-tax Officer of his duty to apply section 24 in an appropriate case. In the result, the appeals are allowed, the judgement of the High Court is set aside and the questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to the High Court are answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee in so far that we hold that the dividend income received from the Pakistan company is deductible in arriving at the total world loss of the assessee under sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Issues Involved:1. Deductibility of dividend income from a Pakistan company against business loss in India under section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.2. Applicability of the Agreement for the Avoidance of Double Taxation between India and Pakistan on the dividend income.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Deductibility of Dividend Income from a Pakistan Company against Business Loss in IndiaThe core issue revolves around whether the assessee's dividend income from a Pakistan company can be set off against its business loss in India. The assessee, a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling sugar, received dividend income from its holdings in a Pakistan-based company during the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58. The Income-tax Officer deducted this dividend income from the business loss in India, which the assessee contested, arguing that the dividend income was not liable to tax in India as it was wholly taxed in Pakistan.The High Court initially ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the dividend income derived from the Pakistan company was not assessable under the Indian Income-tax Act and thus could not be set off against the business loss in India. However, the Supreme Court overturned this decision, emphasizing that under sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, an assessee who has sustained a loss of profits or gains in any year is entitled to set off the amount of the loss against his income, profits, or gains under any other head in that year, provided the income, profits, or gains are assessable under the Act. The Supreme Court clarified that the statute does not contemplate setting off a loss against income not assessable under the Act.Issue 2: Applicability of the Agreement for the Avoidance of Double Taxation between India and PakistanThe Agreement for the Avoidance of Double Taxation between India and Pakistan plays a crucial role in this case. The agreement, concluded between the Dominions of India and Pakistan, specifies that each Dominion shall make assessments in the ordinary way under its own laws and allows for abatement of tax in cases of double taxation.The Supreme Court noted that the agreement does not modify or supersede the provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act for determining the total income of an assessee. The agreement's purpose is to provide relief against double taxation, not to exempt income from being assessed under the respective tax laws of each Dominion. Article IV of the agreement explicitly states that each Dominion shall make assessments in the ordinary way under its own laws, and the agreement only comes into play for granting abatement on the tax charged.The High Court's interpretation that the dividend income from the Pakistan company should be excluded from the taxable income in India was deemed incorrect by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court emphasized that the agreement does not affect the process of determining assessable income under Indian law. The dividend income, taxable under the Indian Income-tax Act by virtue of sub-clause (ii) of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 4, must be included in the total income for assessment purposes.The Supreme Court concluded that the High Court had erred in treating the setting off of the dividend income against the business loss as an infringement of the agreement. The agreement preserves the right of each Dominion to determine assessable income according to its own laws and is concerned only with the degree of retention of the tax charged. Therefore, the dividend income from the Pakistan company is deductible in arriving at the total world loss of the assessee under sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.Conclusion:The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court's judgment and ruling in favor of the Revenue. The dividend income received from the Pakistan company is deductible in arriving at the total world loss of the assessee under sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Revenue is entitled to its costs. Appeals allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found