Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proper multiplier for capitalising the net annual profits of the acquired agricultural lands should be fifteen or a lower figure having regard to the prevailing rate of return at the date of notification.
Analysis: The applicable method for land acquisition valuation is to ascertain the market value at the date of the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Comparable sales are the best evidence where available, but where such evidence is absent, capitalisation of actual or immediately prospective net income may be adopted. The multiplier must reflect the return an ordinary investor would reasonably expect from similar agricultural land, taking into account safety, liquidity, marketability, and risk. In the economic conditions prevailing in 1971 and 1972, agricultural investment would ordinarily command a return higher than safe investments, and the adoption of fifteen years' purchase was not justified.
Conclusion: The proper multiplier could not exceed ten, and the adoption of fifteen was erroneous.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed and the compensation awards based on capitalisation were reduced by applying the correct multiplier, with solatium and interest adjusted accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no comparable sales are available, land acquisition compensation based on capitalisation must be fixed by reference to the prevailing expected return on similar investments at the date of notification, and not by an arbitrary or outdated years' purchase multiplier.