High Court Rules Duty Must Match Entry Time to Protect Importers' Rights

The High Court allowed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner, and ordered the release of goods based on the duty applicable at the time of filing the bill of entry. The court held that applying the enhanced duty retrospectively was impermissible, emphasizing that duties should align with the conditions prevailing at the time of import entry. The judgment protected the rights of importers by prohibiting the retrospective application of duty enhancements.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to assessment order and notification enhancement of customs duty, legality of auction notice, request for re-export of goods, challenge to legality of notification dated 16.02.2019, release of goods based on duty applicable at the time of filing bill of entry.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing leather goods and importing leather from Pakistan, challenged the assessment order passed on Bill of Entry No.2083797 dated 16.02.2019, which was reassessed to 200% customs duty following Notification No.05/2019. The petitioner requested the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the assessment order, notification, and auction notice dated 24.12.2019. The petitioner also sought a writ in the nature of Mandamus to direct respondent No.3 to issue detention memos as per the Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulation, 2009. The petitioner placed an order for importing 'Bovine Crust Leather' from Pakistan in February 2019, filed the Bill of Entry on 16.02.2019, but faced challenges due to the enhanced customs duty and subsequent auction notices without proper communication or permission for re-export.

The High Court referred to a previous judgment by a Division Bench and the Supreme Court's decision, highlighting that the goods had entered India before the impugned notification was issued. The court emphasized that applying the enhanced duty retrospectively was impermissible. Relying on legal precedents, the court held that the petitioners were liable to pay duty as per the rate applicable at the time of filing the bill of entry, disregarding the enhanced duty under the impugned notification. The court directed the respondents to release the goods within seven days upon payment of the duty assessed at the time of filing the bill of entry, irrespective of the enhanced duty imposed post-entry.

In conclusion, the court allowed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner and ordering the release of goods based on the duty applicable at the time of filing the bill of entry. The judgment emphasized the prohibition of retrospective application of duty enhancements and upheld the principle that duties should align with the conditions prevailing at the time of import entry, protecting the rights of importers in such cases.

---