Court remands application under Sabka Vishwas Scheme for reconsideration and fresh declaration, ensuring fair process.

The Court set aside the rejection of the petitioner's application under the "Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019" due to an alleged incorrect declaration regarding penalty amount. The matter was remanded to authorities for reconsideration, directing a review of the declaration and issuance of appropriate orders within two months. The petitioner was allowed to make a fresh declaration if necessary. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, providing relief to the petitioner and ensuring a fair reconsideration process within the specified timeline.

---

---

Issues:
1. Allegation of non-compliance with the Finance Act, 1994 by the petitioner resulting in a demand of Rs. 1,89,87,833.
2. Imposition of penalty under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
3. Appeal filed by the petitioner before the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
4. Introduction of the "Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019" by the Government.
5. Rejection of the petitioner's application under the Scheme due to alleged incorrect declaration.

Issue 1:
The petitioner, an Assessee under the Finance Act, 1994, was issued a Show Cause Notice for non-compliance, leading to a demand of Rs. 1,89,87,833. Despite filing a reply, the demand was confirmed by the authorities, along with imposition of penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Act.

Issue 2:
Challenging the Order-In-Original dated 14.03.2013, the petitioner appealed to the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, which granted a stay on the penalty recovery. The matter remains pending before the Tribunal.

Issue 3:
The Government introduced the "Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019" to settle pending cases related to Central Excise and Service Tax. The petitioner, eligible under the Scheme, filed a declaration seeking relief, which was rejected due to alleged incorrect declaration regarding penalty amount.

Analysis:
The rejection of the petitioner's application under the Scheme was challenged through a writ petition, questioning the violation of scheme rules. The Court, considering a similar case, set aside the rejection order and remanded the matter to authorities for reconsideration. The authorities were directed to review the petitioner's declaration and pass appropriate orders within two months, allowing for a fresh declaration if necessary. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.

This detailed analysis covers the issues of non-compliance, penalty imposition, Tribunal appeal, the Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, and the rejection of the petitioner's application, providing a comprehensive understanding of the legal judgment.

---