ITAT grants Assessee's appeal, directs fair reconsideration under section 80G(5)(vi) The ITAT allowed the appeal of the Assessee, setting aside the rejection of the application under section 80G(5)(vi) of the I.T. Act, 1961 by the Ld. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITAT grants Assessee's appeal, directs fair reconsideration under section 80G(5)(vi)
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the Assessee, setting aside the rejection of the application under section 80G(5)(vi) of the I.T. Act, 1961 by the Ld. CIT(E). The ITAT directed the Ld. CIT(E) to re-decide the matter, ensuring proper consideration of documentary evidence and records, and granting the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. The decision emphasized the importance of following due process and providing the assessee with a reasonable chance to present their case.
Issues: Appeal against rejection of application under section 80G(5)(vi) of the I.T. Act, 1961.
Analysis: The appeal was filed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh, rejecting the application under section 80G(5)(vi) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Ld. CIT(E) noted that for approval under section 80G(5)(vi), the institution or fund must be established in India for 'Charitable Purposes'. The assessee had filed an application on 01.06.2017 for approval under section 80G, after being incorporated on 27.05.2016 and granted registration under section 12AA of the Act on 27.03.2017. The Ld. CIT(E) issued show cause notices to the assessee for information regarding the society's objects, use of donations, and activities not reflected in financial statements. The assessee responded to the queries through email, with the last reply sent on 27.12.2017. However, the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application on 28.12.2017, deeming the assessee uninterested in pursuing the matter.
The Learned Counsel for the Assessee argued that all queries were responded to, and documentary evidence was not fully considered by the Ld. CIT(E). The matter was then presented for reconsideration, with the Ld. D.R. suggesting a remand to the Ld. CIT(E) for a review. The ITAT considered the submissions and found that the Ld. CIT(E) had received responses from the assessee, and the registration under section 12AA indicated charitable objectives were being pursued. The ITAT noted that the last response from the assessee was sent on 29.12.2017, a day after the impugned order was passed. Highlighting the lack of justification for the rejection, the ITAT set aside the order and directed the Ld. CIT(E) to re-decide the matter, ensuring the documentary evidence and records are duly considered and giving the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard.
Therefore, the ITAT allowed the appeal of the Assessee for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a reconsideration of the matter by the Ld. CIT(E) in accordance with the law, providing the assessee with a reasonable and sufficient opportunity to present their case.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.