Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (10) TMI 829 - HC - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court grants interim relief in challenge to onion export ban, allows exports under certain conditions. The court granted interim relief in a case challenging a notification prohibiting onion exports. It directed that shipping bills filed before the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court grants interim relief in challenge to onion export ban, allows exports under certain conditions.

                            The court granted interim relief in a case challenging a notification prohibiting onion exports. It directed that shipping bills filed before the notification should not be considered lapsed until the matter was decided. Consignments with shipping bills generated before the notification were allowed for export, subject to certain conditions. The court highlighted the significance of procedural compliance under the Customs Act and stressed the legal importance of shipping bills. Further proceedings were scheduled for December 2020.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Challenge to the notification prohibiting the export of onions.
                            2. Validity of shipping bills filed before the issuance of the notification.
                            3. Allegations of insider information and arbitrary actions by customs authorities.
                            4. Procedural compliance under the Customs Act, 1962 and related regulations.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Challenge to the Notification Prohibiting the Export of Onions:
                            The petitioners challenged the notification No.31/2015-20 dated 14.09.2020 issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade, which prohibited the export of all varieties of onions with immediate effect. They argued that the notification was arbitrary, unreasonable, and contrary to the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20. The court acknowledged the petitioners' grievance and directed that shipping bills filed prior to the issuance of the notification should not be considered lapsed until the court decided the matter.

                            2. Validity of Shipping Bills Filed Before the Issuance of the Notification:
                            The petitioners contended that their shipping bills for the export of onions were filed before the issuance of the notification and should be allowed for export. The court noted that the shipping bills set in motion the process of exportation and held significant legal sanctity under section 50 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Shipping Bill (Electronic Integrated Declaration and Paperless Processing) Regulations, 2019. The court directed that the consignments with shipping bills filed and generated before 22:28:11 hours on 14.09.2020 should be allowed for export, subject to the clarification given by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs in its communication dated 18.09.2020.

                            3. Allegations of Insider Information and Arbitrary Actions by Customs Authorities:
                            The petitioners alleged that the customs authorities had insider information about the impending notification and arbitrarily stopped processing Let Export Orders for their consignments on 14.09.2020. The court observed that the respondents did not specifically deny these allegations in their affidavits. The court took into account the procedural requirements under sections 50 and 51 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the 2019 Regulations, which emphasize the accuracy and completeness of information in shipping bills and the proper procedure for export clearance.

                            4. Procedural Compliance Under the Customs Act, 1962 and Related Regulations:
                            The court examined the procedural compliance under sections 50 and 51 of the Customs Act, 1962, which deal with the entry and clearance of goods for exportation. The court emphasized that a shipping bill is a crucial document that initiates the export process and must be treated with due sanctity. The court also referred to the internal communication from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs dated 18.09.2020, which clarified that procedural or policy modifications to the disadvantage of exporters should not apply to consignments already handed over to customs for examination and export before the notification date.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court issued a rule and granted interim relief, allowing the export of onions for shipping bills presented and generated before 22:28:11 hours on 14.09.2020. The matter was listed for further hearing in the first week of December 2020. The court's order emphasized the importance of procedural compliance and the legal sanctity of shipping bills in the export process.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found