Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The default was recorded as having occurred on 31.08.2012, while the section 7 application was filed on 26.10.2018. Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to applications under the Code, and the period of three years runs from the date of default. The claimed payment on 18.03.2016 was not accepted as a part-payment by the corporate debtor before expiry of limitation under section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as the entry reflected proceeds deposited through the consortium bank from sale of the corporate debtor's property. That amount therefore did not extend limitation.
Conclusion: The application was held to be barred by limitation and was liable to be dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The insolvency proceeding could not be admitted because the debt claim was time-barred, notwithstanding the application being otherwise complete.
Ratio Decidendi: For an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, limitation begins on the date of default under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and only a payment made by the debtor before expiry of the prescribed period can extend limitation under section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963.