Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (10) TMI 755 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Upholds TPA's Tax Deduction Obligation on Hospital Payments The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision that a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) was required to deduct tax at source on payments made to hospitals under ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court Upholds TPA's Tax Deduction Obligation on Hospital Payments

                          The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision that a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) was required to deduct tax at source on payments made to hospitals under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the reliance on decisions from the Bombay and Delhi High Courts, confirming that payments to hospitals constituted fees for professional services. The court supported the CBDT circular mandating tax deduction but modified the penalty provision. The matter was remanded for reconsideration of the 'assessee-in-default' status, and the appellant was held liable for interest under Section 201(1A).




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Requirement for the TPA to deduct tax at source on payments made to hospitals under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Justification of the Tribunal's reliance on decisions from the Bombay and Delhi High Courts.
                          3. Conformity of CBDT Circular No. 8/2009 with Section 194J.
                          4. Tribunal's decision to remand the matter for reconsideration of the assessee's default status.
                          5. Liability of the appellant to pay interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Requirement for the TPA to Deduct Tax at Source:
                          The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order that the appellant, a TPA, was required to deduct tax at source under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act on payments made to hospitals. The court examined the nature of payments made by the TPA to hospitals, concluding that these payments constituted fees for professional services, thus necessitating tax deduction at source. The court held that the relationship between the assessee and the hospital was principal to principal, and the payments were made under a contractual obligation, not merely on behalf of insured individuals.

                          2. Justification of the Tribunal's Reliance on Decisions from the Bombay and Delhi High Courts:
                          The Tribunal's reliance on the decisions of the Bombay High Court in Dedicated Health Care Service TPA (India) Pvt Ltd v. ACIT and the Delhi High Court in Vipul Medcorp TPA (P) Ltd v. CBDT was justified. The court agreed with these decisions, which interpreted Section 194J to include payments made by TPAs to hospitals as fees for professional services. The court found no reason to deviate from these precedents, emphasizing that the language of Section 194J was clear and unambiguous.

                          3. Conformity of CBDT Circular No. 8/2009 with Section 194J:
                          The court examined Circular No. 8/2009 issued by the CBDT, which mandated tax deduction at source on payments made by TPAs to hospitals. The court upheld the circular to the extent that it required TPAs to deduct tax at source under Section 194J. However, it quashed the part of the circular that suggested a mandatory penalty under Section 271C for failure to deduct tax, as this interfered with the quasi-judicial discretion of assessing officers and appellate authorities.

                          4. Tribunal's Decision to Remand the Matter:
                          The Tribunal's decision to remand the matter to the CIT(A) for reconsideration of the alternate contention that the appellant cannot be held as an 'assessee-in-default' unless it is demonstrated that the payee-hospitals failed to discharge their tax liability was upheld. The court agreed that the CIT(A) should independently apply its mind to this aspect without being influenced by the CBDT circular.

                          5. Liability of the Appellant to Pay Interest:
                          The appellant's liability to pay interest under Section 201(1A) was affirmed. The court held that the appellant was liable for interest due to the failure to deduct tax at source, irrespective of whether the payee-hospitals had discharged their tax liabilities.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was disposed of with the court affirming the Tribunal's findings and the applicability of Section 194J to the payments made by the TPA to hospitals. The court upheld the CBDT circular with modifications and emphasized the need for independent consideration by the CIT(A) on the 'assessee-in-default' issue. The appellant was held liable for interest under Section 201(1A).
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found