TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim payments received by former estate-holders under section 50(2) of the Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 were capital receipts not liable to income-tax, or revenue receipts taxable in the assessees' hands.
Analysis: The statutory scheme provided for vesting of the estates in the Government on the notified date, while compensation payable to the former holders was to be finally determined later under section 39. The Act also made distinct provision for advance compensation, total compensation, additional compensation, and interim payments. The interim payments were computed with reference to the loss of income from the estates and were not fixed by reference to the ultimate compensation. Section 50(8) stated only that such payments were not part of the compensation deposited under section 41(1) or in lieu of that compensation; it did not negative their character as compensation for the loss of an income-producing asset. On that footing, the payments were held to be for the destruction or taking away of a capital asset and not for the use or withholding of money due by way of compensation or interest.
Conclusion: The interim payments under section 50(2) were capital receipts and were not liable to income-tax.
TaxTMI 
