Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the gifts of land and hospital building qualified for exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 as gifts made in the course of carrying on the donor's profession and bona fide for the purpose of that profession.
Analysis: The exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) applies only where the gift is made in the course of carrying on a business, profession or vocation and is proved to have been made bona fide for the purpose of that business, profession or vocation. The deed itself described the transfer as made out of love and affection, and the record contained no evidence showing that the transfer was made in the course of the donor's medical profession or for the purpose of carrying it on. A gift is not exempt merely because the property continued to be used in the same manner as before, and the broader test of commercial expediency was not supported by the facts found.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available, and the gifts did not fall within section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to exemption for the disputed gifts, and the Revenue succeeded in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption under section 5(1)(xiv), it must be shown that the gift was made in the course of carrying on the business, profession or vocation and bona fide for its purpose; a mere continuation of use of the gifted property or general commercial advantage is insufficient.