Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2020 (10) TMI 278 - Tri - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Approval of Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 2013: Transfer, Compliance, Dissolution The Tribunal approved the Scheme of Amalgamation among multiple companies under the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme was sanctioned with specific orders ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Approval of Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 2013: Transfer, Compliance, Dissolution

                            The Tribunal approved the Scheme of Amalgamation among multiple companies under the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme was sanctioned with specific orders for the transfer of assets, liabilities, and proceedings to the Transferee Company. The Tribunal directed the Transferee Company to comply with statutory requirements, pay fees for increased authorized capital, and ensure the protection of employees' interests. The order specified the dissolution of certain Transferor Companies upon registration of the Tribunal's order with the Registrar of Companies, with provisions for further directions if needed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation.
                            2. Territorial jurisdiction of the Tribunal.
                            3. Compliance with statutory requirements and directions.
                            4. Protection of employees' interests.
                            5. Payment of fees for increased authorized capital.
                            6. Examination of the Scheme by the Regional Director and Official Liquidator.
                            7. Compliance with Accounting Standards.
                            8. Absence of objections from statutory authorities.
                            9. Pending investigation proceedings.
                            10. Sanctioning of the Scheme and related orders.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation:
                            The petitions were filed for the approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation among several companies, including the Transferor Companies and the Transferee Company, under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme was annexed as Annexure "E" in the petitions.

                            2. Territorial Jurisdiction of the Tribunal:
                            The registered offices of Transferor Companies 1 to 4 were in Mumbai, falling under the jurisdiction of NCLT, Mumbai, which had already sanctioned the Scheme. The petitions were filed by Transferor Companies 5 and 6 and the Transferee Company, whose registered offices were in Tamil Nadu, under the jurisdiction of this Tribunal.

                            3. Compliance with Statutory Requirements and Directions:
                            The First Motion Application sought directions for dispensation and convening of meetings, and the Tribunal issued directions on 01.10.2019. Notices were served to statutory/regulatory authorities, and public notices were published in "Business Standard" and "Maalai Chudar."

                            4. Protection of Employees' Interests:
                            The Regional Director's report stated that the Scheme provided for the protection of the interests of the employees of the Transferor Companies. The Petitioner Companies were regular in filing statutory returns, with no pending prosecutions or inspections.

                            5. Payment of Fees for Increased Authorized Capital:
                            The Regional Director observed that the Transferee Company must comply with Section 232 (3) (i) of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding the payment of fees for enhanced authorized capital. The Petitioner Companies undertook to amend the Memorandum and Articles of Association and pay the requisite fees.

                            6. Examination of the Scheme by the Regional Director and Official Liquidator:
                            The Regional Director did not object to the Scheme, except for the observation on authorized capital fees. The Official Liquidator's joint report stated that the affairs of Transferor Companies 5 and 6 were not conducted prejudicially. The Chartered Accountant's report confirmed compliance with Accounting Standards and no adverse findings.

                            7. Compliance with Accounting Standards:
                            The Petitioner Companies filed a certificate of compliance with Accounting Standards, fulfilling the requirements of Sections 230 (7) and 232 (3) of the Companies Act, 2013.

                            8. Absence of Objections from Statutory Authorities:
                            Despite notices, there was no representation from the Income Tax Department, implying no objections to the Scheme.

                            9. Pending Investigation Proceedings:
                            The Petitioner Companies confirmed no pending investigation proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956 or 2013.

                            10. Sanctioning of the Scheme and Related Orders:
                            The Tribunal sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement, with specific orders regarding the transfer of properties, liabilities, and proceedings to the Transferee Company. The appointed date for the Scheme was 1st April 2018. Employees of Transferor Companies 5 and 6 were to become employees of the Transferee Company without interruption. The Transferee Company was directed to file revised Memorandum and Articles of Association and pay the differential fee for enhanced authorized capital. Transferor Companies 5 and 6 were to be dissolved upon registration of the Tribunal's order with the Registrar of Companies.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the Company Petitions, sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation on the aforementioned terms, with provisions for further directions if necessary. The order clarified that it did not exempt payment of stamp duty, taxes, or other charges required by law.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found