Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the recovery notice demanding interest under the voluntary compliance scheme was sustainable, and whether interest was required to be computed on the unpaid dues after taking into account the petitioner's partial payments.
Analysis: The petitioner had made payments on different dates towards the declared tax amount. On the material placed, the impugned recovery notice appeared to compute interest on the entire declared amount without giving credit to the partial payments already made. The governing scheme required the liability to be worked out with reference to the unpaid dues, and not on the full declared amount irrespective of subsequent remittances. Since the notice did not reflect consideration of the petitioner's staggered payments, it was found to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The recovery notice was quashed, and the respondent was directed to recompute the interest after taking note of the payments made on various dates. The bank account was also allowed to be operated subject to withholding of Rs. 5 lakhs pending fresh consideration.