TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Scheme of Arrangement Approved, Petition Made Absolute</h1> <h3>In Re : Amura Marketing Technologies Private Limited, K2V2 Technologies Private Limited</h3> In Re : Amura Marketing Technologies Private Limited, K2V2 Technologies Private Limited - TMI Issues:1. Sanction sought under Sections 230 to 232 read with Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 for a Scheme of Arrangement.2. Approval of Scheme of Arrangement by respective Board of Directors.3. Rationale for the Scheme of Arrangement.4. Compliance with statutory requirements and affidavits filed.5. Response to objections raised by unsecured creditors.6. Report of the Regional Director and clarifications provided by the Petitioner Companies.7. Fairness and legality of the Scheme of Arrangement.8. Directions for stamp duty adjudication and filing with regulatory authorities.Analysis:1. The judgment pertains to a Scheme of Arrangement seeking sanction under Sections 230 to 232 read with Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme involves the demerger of a Product Business from one company to another, along with a reduction of share capital.2. The approval of the Scheme by the respective Board of Directors of the involved companies plays a crucial role in the legal process. Board Resolutions supporting the Scheme were passed by the companies, demonstrating internal approval.3. The rationale behind the Scheme of Arrangement includes the segregation of businesses, allowing independent growth strategies for each company, enhancing valuation and flexibility in accessing capital, and enabling separate collaborations and expansions for the companies involved.4. The Petitioner Companies have demonstrated compliance with statutory requirements, including filing necessary affidavits with the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. Undertakings to fulfill all statutory requirements have been accepted by the Tribunal.5. Responses to objections raised by unsecured creditors have been addressed, with the Petitioner Companies settling outstanding amounts and providing proof of payment. Unsecured creditors who initially opposed the scheme did not appear before the Tribunal to maintain their objections.6. The Regional Director's report highlighted certain observations related to accounting standards and the effective dates of the Scheme. The Petitioner Companies responded to these observations, ensuring compliance with accounting standards and the appointed date as specified in the Scheme.7. The Tribunal found the Scheme to be fair, reasonable, and in compliance with the law, with no opposition from concerned parties. As a result, the Company Scheme Petition was made absolute by the Tribunal.8. Directions were issued for stamp duty adjudication and filing the Scheme with regulatory authorities within specified timelines to complete the legal process and ensure compliance with all necessary formalities. Interested parties were given the liberty to apply for any necessary directions related to the matter.
TaxTMI 