Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on a pro-rata basis for the year under consideration when the same basis had been accepted in earlier years and there was no change in facts.
Analysis: The assessee had consistently claimed deduction on a pro-rata basis from the initial assessment year, and the record showed that the Revenue had ed the claim in earlier years, including by assessments under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The facts relevant to the housing project remained unchanged, and no reason was brought on record to justify a different view in the year under appeal. In such circumstances, the settled principle that a benefit accepted in earlier years should not be denied in a subsequent year in the absence of a change in facts applied.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on a pro-rata basis for the year under consideration.
Final Conclusion: The disallowance made by the lower authorities was set aside, the additional ground was allowed, and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a deduction has been consistently allowed in earlier years on an identical factual basis, it cannot be withdrawn in a later year unless a material change in facts or law is shown.