TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court directs Tribunal to assess deduction eligibility under Income-tax Act, provides time for detailed review</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Limited</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Limited - [1975] 98 ITR 341 Issues:1. Deduction claim for contributions to an employees' provident fund.2. Recognition of the provident fund by the Commissioner of Income-tax.3. Interpretation of relevant provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.4. Allowance of contributions made by an employer to a recognized provident fund.5. Requirement of effective arrangements for tax deduction at source from payments made from the fund.6. Determination of whether credit entries in the books of accounts constitute payment under the Act.Analysis:The judgment pertains to a reference under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, regarding the entitlement of an assessee to claim a deduction for contributions made to an employees' provident fund. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of reference to relevant provisions by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the counsel, emphasizing the importance of including statutory provisions in the appellate order or the statement of the case. The key issue was whether the Commissioner's recognition of the fund was binding, especially for contributions made before the recognition date. The Tribunal relied on the Commissioner's instructions for upholding the deduction claim, leading to a debate on the legality and impact of such instructions.Regarding the fund's recognition under the Employees' Provident Funds Act, the judgment highlighted that the fund was deemed recognized for income tax purposes under section 9 of the Act. This raised the question of whether the fund's recognition by the Commissioner was significant, as Chapter IX-A of the Income-tax Act governs recognized provident funds. The court noted the absence of provisions permitting deductions for employer contributions to recognized provident funds, emphasizing the relevance of sections 10(2)(xv) and 10(4)(c) in such cases. The judgment underscored the necessity of effective arrangements for tax deduction at source from taxable payments made from the fund, a factor that had not been addressed by the Tribunal.The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to assess whether the contributions in question could be allowed as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) read with section 10(4)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal was instructed to provide a supplementary statement of the case within one month to address the pending issues comprehensively. The judgment refrained from awarding costs at that stage, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the material on record to determine the deductibility of the contributions.
TaxTMI 