Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether depreciation on goodwill was allowable; (ii) Whether disallowance of mark-to-market foreign exchange loss was sustainable.
Issue (i): Whether depreciation on goodwill was allowable.
Analysis: The claim was held to be covered by the co-ordinate bench in the assessee's own case for an earlier assessment year. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that goodwill can constitute an intangible asset eligible for depreciation, and the matter had already been decided in favour of the assessee on similar facts.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether disallowance of mark-to-market foreign exchange loss was sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and accepted the loss on revaluation of forward exchange contracts as allowable. On parity of reasoning, the disallowance was directed to be deleted.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed in full, as both disputed additions were resolved against it by following the earlier decision in the assessee's own case.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a co-ordinate bench has already decided identical issues in the assessee's own case on similar facts, consistency warrants following that view, and depreciation on goodwill as well as mark-to-market foreign exchange loss may be allowed accordingly.