NCLAT Upholds Dismissal of NPA Challenge Petitions for Everon Castings Pvt. Ltd.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the dismissal of petitions challenging the NPA declaration and seeking relief from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process for M/s. Everon Castings Pvt. Ltd. The Managing Director's efforts to address CIRP delays and reconsider resolution plans were unsuccessful, leading to liquidation orders. The court clarified that the moratorium did not extend to personal guarantors but allowed the guarantor to seek relief through appropriate channels. The disposal of complaints and writ petitions emphasized adherence to legal procedures and concluded the cases without costs.

---

---

Issues:
1. CIRP Process and Declaration of Corporate Debtor as NPA
2. Dismissal of Petitions Seeking Relief from CIRP Process
3. Guarantor's Liability and Declaration of NPA
4. Moratorium under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
5. Personal Guarantor's Liability and Moratorium Application
6. Sale of Guarantor's Property and Challenges
7. Application of Moratorium to Guarantor
8. Disposal of Complaints and Writ Petitions

CIRP Process and Declaration of Corporate Debtor as NPA:
The case involves two writ petitioners associated with M/s.Everon Castings Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing unit facing financial distress. The Corporate Debtor was declared insolvent, leading to the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by an operational creditor. The Managing Director of the Corporate Debtor sought reliefs from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), challenging disqualification decisions and the NPA declaration by State Bank of India. However, the petitions were dismissed, and subsequent appeals were also rejected by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

Dismissal of Petitions Seeking Relief from CIRP Process:
The Managing Director's petitions aimed to exclude delays in CIRP, reconsider resolution plans, and challenge the NPA status. Despite efforts to address lacunae in the CIRP process, the NCLT and NCLAT upheld decisions against the petitioners, leading to liquidation orders for the Corporate Debtor. The legal challenges to the NPA declaration and exclusion of delays were unsuccessful, resulting in the dismissal of the petitions.

Guarantor's Liability and Declaration of NPA:
Another petitioner, a guarantor to the loans of the Corporate Debtor, contested the NPA declaration during the CIRP, claiming it was illegal and sought to void related proceedings. The guarantor emphasized her lack of involvement in the Corporate Debtor's decisions and questioned the legality of actions taken against her property by the State Bank of India.

Moratorium under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
The petitioners argued that the State Bank of India's actions, including declaring NPA during CIRP, were unlawful due to the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. They contended that such actions violated the code's principles and disrupted the resolution process, emphasizing the importance of upholding the moratorium provisions.

Personal Guarantor's Liability and Moratorium Application:
The respondent bank argued that the moratorium did not extend to personal guarantors, citing legal precedents. They maintained that the guarantor's assets were distinct from the Corporate Debtor's and that pursuing the guarantor's assets was permissible outside the insolvency proceedings, as the moratorium applied only to the Corporate Debtor's assets.

Sale of Guarantor's Property and Challenges:
The respondent bank proceeded with the sale of the guarantor's property, asserting compliance with the SARFAESI Act and DRT confirmation. The guarantor's challenges to the sale notices were questioned, highlighting the bank's actions within the legal framework and the absence of challenges to the sale process.

Application of Moratorium to Guarantor:
The court clarified that while the moratorium did not apply to personal guarantors, the guarantor's situation as a third party without direct involvement in the Corporate Debtor's management warranted consideration. The court permitted the guarantor to seek relief through appropriate channels, recognizing an alternative remedy available to address the concerns raised.

Disposal of Complaints and Writ Petitions:
The court closed one writ petition and disposed of another, considering the legal proceedings, appeals, and observations made by the NCLAT. The judgments emphasized the need for adherence to legal procedures and the pursuit of remedies within the established framework, ultimately concluding the cases without costs.

---