Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, dividend could reasonably have been distributed so as to attract section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The governing principle is that the question under section 23A must be judged from the standpoint of a prudent businessman and not as a tax collector. The relevant enquiry is whether, having regard to commercial profits, the financial position of the company, reserves, and surrounding circumstances, it was reasonable not to distribute dividend. For this purpose, the material consideration is commercial profit and not merely assessed income. On the facts found, the company had substantial commercial profits and available surplus in both years, no dividend was declared, there was no established business necessity justifying non-distribution, and subsequent losses were irrelevant to the statutory enquiry. The financial position and reserves showed that a dividend could reasonably have been paid.
Conclusion: The statutory condition for application of section 23A was satisfied, and the provision was rightly applied; the answer is against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under section 23A, the reasonableness of non-distribution of dividend must be determined on the basis of commercial profits and the conduct of a prudent businessman, and subsequent losses do not affect that enquiry.