Tribunal voids reassessment due to invalid notice to deceased assessee, allowing appeal on capital gains.

The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings and the consequent reassessment order as the notice issued to the deceased assessee was deemed invalid, rendering the proceedings void for want of jurisdiction. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents to support its decision, emphasizing that a notice under Section 148 to a deceased person is legally null. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 26,26,772/- on account of long-term capital gains was not addressed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reassessment notice issued under Section 148 to a deceased person.
2. Consequential reassessment order's validity.
3. Sustaining the addition of Rs. 26,26,772/- on account of long-term capital gains.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Reassessment Notice Issued Under Section 148 to a Deceased Person:
The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 to the deceased assessee. The legal heir argued that the notice issued to a deceased person was invalid and void ab initio. The notice under Section 148 was issued on 30.03.2016, while the assessee had expired on 24.04.2012. The legal heir contended that no notice was issued to them, and subsequent notices and query letters were also addressed to the deceased. The Tribunal noted that the issuance of a valid notice is a condition precedent for the validity of reassessment proceedings. It was established that the notice issued to a deceased person is a nullity in the eyes of law, as supported by various judicial precedents, including the cases of Balbir Singh vs. ITO and Sumit Balkrishna Gupta vs. Assistant CIT. The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing notice to the deceased assessee were void for want of jurisdiction.

2. Consequential Reassessment Order's Validity:
The Tribunal examined whether the reassessment order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 was valid, given that the initial notice was issued to a deceased person. The Tribunal found that no subsequent notice under Section 148 was issued to the legal heirs of the deceased assessee. Moreover, the limitation period for issuing such notice had expired on 31.03.2016. The Tribunal referred to the provisions of Section 159 and concluded that these provisions could not be invoked since no valid notice under Section 148 was issued to the legal heirs within the limitation period. Consequently, the reassessment order was quashed for being void ab initio.

3. Sustaining the Addition of Rs. 26,26,772/- on Account of Long-Term Capital Gains:
Given the Tribunal's findings on the invalidity of the reassessment notice and the subsequent reassessment order, the issue of sustaining the addition of Rs. 26,26,772/- on account of long-term capital gains became academic. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of this addition, as the reassessment proceedings themselves were found to be void and without jurisdiction.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing notice to the deceased assessee and the consequent reassessment order for want of jurisdiction. The Tribunal's decision was based on the settled legal principle that a notice issued under Section 148 to a deceased person is a nullity in the eyes of law. As a result, all other grounds raised by the assessee became academic and were dismissed as infructuous. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

---