Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal had jurisdiction to permit the assessee to raise an additional ground before it, even though that ground had not been urged before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner.
Analysis: The disputed amount was already the subject-matter of the appeal before the appellate authorities, and the new plea merely raised an alternative legal basis as to why that amount should not be taxed as capital gains. The Tribunal's power under section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is wide, and the corresponding provision in the earlier Act shows that it is not confined to questions specifically argued before the departmental authorities. If the material on record or further material can justify relief on another ground, the Tribunal may allow that ground to be raised.
Conclusion: The Tribunal had jurisdiction to allow the assessee to raise the additional ground, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the department.
Ratio Decidendi: The Appellate Tribunal may entertain and decide an additional ground relating to a matter already in appeal, even if that ground was not raised before the lower appellate authority, because its appellate power extends to all questions of law or fact necessary to determine the assessee's liability.