Pre-enhancement hearing requirement bars tax increase in appeal without prior opportunity to contest proposed liability.

The appellate power to enhance tax under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax framework is subject to a mandatory pre-enhancement hearing. Where the statute expressly requires notice of the proposed increase and an opportunity to be heard, an order enhancing liability without showing compliance with that safeguard cannot stand. The impugned enhancement was therefore set aside to that extent, and the matter was remitted for a fresh decision after hearing the assessee on the proposed increase.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal could enhance the assessee's tax liability without giving an opportunity of hearing as required before increasing the tax under the statutory appeal provision.

Analysis: The explanation to Section 53 of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax, 2005 expressly permits variation of assessment in appeal, including enhancement of tax, but mandates that before increasing tax or any other amount, the dealer must be given an opportunity of being heard on the proposal to increase liability. The impugned order did not disclose that such opportunity was afforded before the enhancement was made. The challenge was therefore confined to compliance with the statutory hearing requirement and did not require examination of the merits of the reassessment.

Conclusion: The enhancement of tax liability without prior hearing was unsustainable, and the order was set aside to that extent.

Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back to the Tribunal to grant hearing to the assessee on the proposed enhancement and to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: When a statute expressly requires a pre-enhancement opportunity of hearing, any appellate order increasing tax without complying with that mandate cannot be sustained.

---