Court directs Superintendent to consider petitioner's representation on Input Tax Credit interest per GST Council, allowing soft copy use.

The Court directed the Superintendent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding interest on Input Tax Credit in accordance with the decision of the GST Council, preferably within eight weeks, emphasizing adherence to the Council's guidelines. The Court also allowed the petitioner to use a soft copy of the order from the High Court's website due to the COVID-19 lockdown. This ruling highlights the importance of aligning administrative actions with regulatory decisions, ensuring consistency and compliance with established norms in tax matters.

---

---

Issues:
1. Demand of interest under Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 on Input Tax Credit availed by the petitioner.
2. Interpretation of the decision taken in the 39th meeting of GST Council regarding charging interest on Net Cash Tax Liability.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, registered under Central Goods and Service Tax, filed returns for three financial years at a belated stage and availed Input Tax Credit while filing GSTR-3B returns as a Works Contractor. The Superintendent demanded interest for the three financial years amounting to Rs. 2,24,487 under Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, stating that interest is payable on ITC set off. The petitioner contended that as per the decision in the 39th meeting of GST Council, interest for delay in payment of GST should be charged on Net Cash Tax Liability retrospectively from 01.07.2017, not on Input Tax Credit. A representation was submitted to the Superintendent requesting not to charge interest on availed ITC, but no action was taken. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition directing the Superintendent to consider the representation in line with the GST Council's decision, preferably within eight weeks, and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

2. The Court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of the petitioner's representation in light of the decision taken in the 39th meeting of GST Council. The Court's direction to the Superintendent to consider the representation and communicate the decision within a stipulated timeframe reflects the importance of adhering to the decisions and guidelines set forth by the GST Council. Additionally, the Court acknowledged the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown period and allowed the petitioner to utilize the soft copy of the order from the High Court's website, ensuring accessibility and compliance during the challenging circumstances posed by the pandemic. This judgment underscores the significance of aligning administrative actions with the decisions and directives issued by relevant regulatory bodies like the GST Council, promoting consistency and adherence to established norms in tax matters.

---