Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Supreme Court emphasizes integrity in appointing Resolution Professional under Insolvency & Bankruptcy framework The Supreme Court directed the appointment of a new Resolution Professional by the National Company Law Tribunal within a week, emphasizing that the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court emphasizes integrity in appointing Resolution Professional under Insolvency & Bankruptcy framework
The Supreme Court directed the appointment of a new Resolution Professional by the National Company Law Tribunal within a week, emphasizing that the replacement should not cast doubt on the integrity of the professional being replaced. The Court clarified that the change should not reflect negatively on the professionalism or conduct of the individual being substituted. The impugned order was found to be incorrect and should not set a precedent for future cases. The civil appeal was disposed of, providing clarity on the correct procedure for appointing Resolution Professionals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy framework.
Issues Involved: Appointment of Resolution Professional under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai, and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari, addressed the issue of the appointment of a Resolution Professional under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the approach taken by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in disqualifying a Resolution Professional solely based on their association with a particular entity and receiving pension benefits. The Court noted that the NCLAT's approach was not correct. However, considering the agreement of both parties' counsels, the Court directed the appointment of a new Resolution Professional by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) within a week, in accordance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
The Supreme Court emphasized that the replacement of the Resolution Professional should not cast any doubt on the integrity of the professional being replaced. The Court clarified that the change in Resolution Professional should not be viewed as reflecting negatively on the professionalism or conduct of the individual being substituted. Additionally, the Court ruled that the impugned order, which was found to be incorrect in its approach, should not be considered as setting a precedent for future cases. Consequently, the civil appeal was disposed of by the Supreme Court, providing clarity on the correct procedure for appointing Resolution Professionals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy framework.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
